(The Fiscal Times) --- A high-level
Russian official on Wednesday asserted again that the Kremlin has
the right to
move nuclear weapons into the disputed Crimean peninsula, which Russian troops
invaded last year — and suggested that a key nuclear arms control agreement
between the U.S. and Russia is in danger of breaking down.
On the question of
sending nuclear weapons into Crimea ,
Russia ’s
Interfax news agency quoted Mikhail Ulyanov as saying, “I don't know if there
are nuclear weapons there now. I don't know about any plans, but in principle Russia can do
it.” It’s a position that other Russian officials have articulated in the past.
Ulyanov’s boss, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, made similar comments
in December.
More surprising was
Ulyanov’s warning about the status of the Intermediate Range Nuclear Force
Treaty, signed by the U.S.
and the Soviet Union in 1987. The deal was
designed to eliminate the two countries’ stocks of nuclear and ballistic
missiles with ranges of between 300 and 3,400 miles.
The escalating
rhetoric over nuclear weapons comes as tensions continue to rise in Europe . On Tuesday, Russia
formally withdrew from a different treaty limiting conventional armed forces in
Europe . Over the weekend, the president of the
European Commission called for a Pan-European Army specifically to serve as a
counterweight against Russia ’s
aggression.
The U.S. has repeatedly called on Russia to admit
to violations of the nuclear treaty. The Kremlin, not surprisingly, has
declined to do so.
The government-owned
news agency ITAR-TASS reported on comments made by Ulyanov Wednesday morning.
“Some actions by our U.S.
colleagues cause great surprise,” he reportedly said. “In their scheme of
things we are expected to say voluntarily what we have violated and to confess
violations. This kind of approach does not look serious to us.”
Ulyanov charged that
the U.S.
is undermining global stability and making progress toward nuclear disarmament
more difficult, TASS reported. Ulyanov reportedly said the presence of U.S. anti-ballistic missiles in Europe and “development of high-precision strategic
non-nuclear weapons” are damaging the prospects for continued cooperation on
nuclear arms issues.
"In such
circumstances, the continuation of the nuclear disarmament process seems
problematic,” he said.
"The
discussion with the United
States on this subject will go on. Its
outcome is anyone’s guess,” he added before concluding with the backhanded
assurance that “at this point it would be wrong to say that the treaty is
falling apart.”
No comments:
Post a Comment