(Newsweek) --- NATO has ranked Russia
as its greatest threat, according to defence experts, as the alliance announced
its plans to staff six new European bases in what its secretary general Jens
Stoltenberg is calling “the biggest reinforcement of our collective defence
since the end of the Cold War”.
The plan will see
NATO’s rapid reaction units grow to 30,000 soldiers from 13,000, and six
stations will be set up in the alliance’s easternmost member states - Estonia,
Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria, all of whom either border
Russia or share the Black Sea with annexed Crimea.
According to
general Charles Wald, former-deputy commander of U.S. European Command, the
move marks the “continuum of a wake-up call that is the threat of Russia in Ukraine ”.
Ints Kalnins/Reuters |
“It is a much bigger deal than it appears on
paper,” Wald says. “The question for Europe
is: is Putin creeping further and further west? Is this a precursor to Russia moving into Moldova ? Nagorno Karabakh has been
bubbling up and the Georgia
issue is still unresolved.”
“NATO has
essentially set these bases in its frontline states,” Wald says, referring to
the countries’ proximity to Russian territory.
“What they will do
is they will have the infrastructure to guide NATO’s forces to where they will
have to go, supply them with equipment, intelligence apparatus and whatever they
will need for supply chains, in the case of an attack on NATO territory.”
According to Ward , Poland
and the Baltic states are the NATO member states “most nervous” of potential
pro-Russian violence breaking out on their territories, as it has in Ukraine . The
rapid response strategy is intended to prevent a spillover of pro-Russian
violence into NATO and possibly deter violence from spreading in Ukraine .
“It is a little
different with Ukraine
because they are not part of NATO, but they are part of Europe
and they are under attack,” Ward explains.
“The Ukrainians are
never going to beat the Russians but they can at least fight them off their
territory. Our belief is that we need to help the Ukrainians make it a bad
trade off for Russia
to continue expanding west,” Wald adds.
Yesterday NATO
members Poland and Lithuania also agreed to form a joint military
battalion with Ukraine , in a
bid to further strengthen the military partnership between the West and Kiev .
According to
Michael Clarke director general of the Royal United Services Institute which
studies global defence and security, the move symbolises the return of Russia as
NATO’s biggest security threat.
“The spearhead
force is all part of NATO’s infrastructure plan,” Clarke says. “We are not
adding any new units or putting any new spending into this, but rather we are
reallocating existing units to be ready in eastern Europe from other parts of
the world such as Belize,”
“They are there as
skeleton staff at this point, but the point is that if they were activated it
would enable reinforcements to arrive and act much more quickly as part of the
NATO reinforcement plan,” Clarke says.
“NATO ranks Russia as its highest threat,” Clarke adds, but
explains that for obvious reasons the governments of some NATO members are more
immediately concerned by Russia ’s
actions than others.
“At this point in
time the strategy is to show that NATO is a collective alliance, which shares
risks, but if anything kicks off the facilities will be more than capable of
dealing with the threat,” adding that Poland and the Baltic countries are
among those most worried about a Russian advance.
“It is in the UK ’s interest
to reinvigorate NATO. Russia
is a more fundamental danger, as opposed the Middle East .”
“If you press UK policy makers they will also probably admit
that Russia poses the most
serious security threat globally, but because it is below the level of open
conflict in Ukraine ,
they are more reluctant to say that,” Clarke says.
According to
Clarke’s colleague at RUSI, former Royal Navy officer Michael Codner, security
has taken a back seat to the UK
government’s agenda as the upcoming election has brought other issues such as
the economy, healthcare and the threat of homegrown terrorism.
“It should be a top
level issue, but it has been swept under the rug” Codner says.
Charles Wald echoes
Clarke and Codner’s words but believes that the UK ’s influence in NATO operations
is crucial.
“Poland and the Baltic states are the most
nervous about Russia , but the
UK is the major player in Europe if anything goes down in NATO,” he says.
“They are being
cautious with involvement, because they have their own economic issues but with
regard to the moral initiative to act, if the US
does something the UK
will be right behind it.”
The announcement of
the new spearhead force has not been received warmly by Russia , with Alexander Lukashevich a
spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Defence holding a special press
briefing where he warned NATO’s latest move would “inform Russia 's
subsequent military planning”.
“This plan is in
and of itself very disturbing, because it is about raising NATO capabilities on
our borders.”
“The so called plan
to reinforce the eastern flank of NATO is nothing other than an increase in the
battle readiness of the alliance,” Lukashevich added.
In a speech today
Jens Stoltenberg played down speculation NATO’s eastern reinforcement signified
concern that Russia will
mount a western advance, but highlighted the move did come as a result of the
“sharply escalated’ violence in eastern Ukraine , caused by “Russian-backed
separatists”.
No comments:
Post a Comment