In 2008, Russian
tanks crossed their southern border, invading and crushing the military forces
of the tiny Republic
of Georgia . Georgia 's U.S.
and European allies raised feeble objections to Russia 's incursion -- but little
more.
In fact, just two
years after Russia's "short, victorious war" in Georgia, French
defense contractor DCNS happily announced the signing of a $1.7 billion
contract to sell the Russian Navy a pair of 16,500-ton Mistral-class
amphibious warfare ships. Capable of putting ashore an assault force of up to
40 tanks or 900 assault troops -- and carrying as many as 16 combat helicopters
-- these ambidextrous aircraft carriers offered Russia's military an
unprecedented ability to threaten nearby littoral nations. But then, Russia invaded
a second sovereign country.
Infographic by TASS. |
And this was the
straw that broke the Mistral's back.
So long, Mistral.
The first ofFrance 's Mistrals, tentatively named the "Vladivostok ," was scheduled to be delivered to Russia on Nov.
14. Under pressure from allies, however, French President Francois Hollande
announced last week that he is "suspending" its delivery.
The first of
As Hollande's
office explained in a statement: "The president of the republic considers
the present situation in east Ukraine
still does not allow the delivery" of the Mistral. Which makes sense --
not giving Russia
weapons at the same time when it's using those weapons to attack its neighbours.
This does, however,
pose a problem for DCNS, one of France 's
biggest defense contractors. Russian state news outlet TASS reports that Russia may sue France for breach of contract if it
fails to deliver the warships -- demanding as much as $3.7 billion in damages.
And even if the lawyers don't get it, DCNS still stands to lose the $1.7
billion purchase price.
Or not
One possibility that's been mooted to ease DCNS' pain is that NATO could buyFrance 's Mistrals. After all, Europe hasn't been spending anywhere near the 2%-of-GDP
goal that NATO sets for defense spending among its members. They could
certainly use the extra armament.
One possibility that's been mooted to ease DCNS' pain is that NATO could buy
America's mini-aircraft carrier, the
USS America (LHA-6), is twice the size of each, costs almost four times as much. Source: |
Others have
suggested that the Mistral's size -- about half that of an American
America-class warship, or equivalent in size to Japan's fleet of so-called
helicopter destroyers -- and its low price -- roughly one-quarter
that of these vessels -- might fit well within the U.S. Navy as a sort of
mini-aircraft carrier.
A third option recently surfaced,
however, in the pages of Canada 's
National Post. Canada ,
which is currently in the midst of a $50 billion project to rebuild and expand
its navy, could buy the Mistrals as part of that effort. This naturally would
cause defence contractors in Canada
and the States to scream bloody murder as they hoped to carve up that cash. Personally
this option to me is the best as they would be a great asset to the Canadian
Forces giving them a capability they lack at present but sadly Ottawa has never been known for making smart
decisions on military procurement.
No comments:
Post a Comment